License Eucon Protocol to Third Party Manufacturers Allow other companies full access to the Eucon code base so they can develop next. It’s funny how people are asking SSL, Neve etc to integrate Eucon into their consoles without thinking that the reason AVID bought Euphonix. Everywhere this protocol is brought up, it’s highly praised. I don’t believe that Eucon is that much of a closed protocol anymore since Avid’s.
|Published (Last):||25 June 2012|
|PDF File Size:||7.77 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||15.24 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Advice for doing this on my own is also welcome. Eucon is in many a software but only avid makes any hardware. Instead of the classic console-like shape of protodol controller why not have a huge touch-screen and be able to touch Pro Tools directly without the need of another app to bridge the gap? I would really appreciate some Eucon control here.
New EuCon Software For Euphonix MC Pro & System 5-MC DAW Controllers
I love the size too. Obviously obtainign some sort of licensing to do it would be critical but would they even play ball 3. However, most project studios nowadays do not employ a console in their setup for two obvious reasons: At 10 bit you have 0.
Bumpage, I wanna know too. You tell me whar a man gits his corn pone, en I’ll tell you what his ‘pinions is.
Originally Protocpl by airon. Such products already exist and the most successful one is made by Slate Digital.
Thanks for your patch, but I actually wanted communication between Max and Eucon-enabled Software, not the Euphonix-Hardware-Controllers though they are sexy.
They come in all shapes and sizes and there are plenty manufacturers out there making DAW controllers that either have lots of pads or a console-like look, with faders and rotary encoders. The MIDI-Bus is simply to slow and the acces methods for querying and setting parameters are too limited. Hey If it’s to drive audio fader with servo the MCU protocol is fine. Here’s someone who seems to have it working:. Cakewalk was waaay ahead of me on this one.
Future Sonar Support for EuCon Protocol? | Cakewalk Forums
The functionality and looks of TouchDAW is super impressive considering the price tag — however after trying it in multiple projects I stopped using it as I realized it just took so much more time to use that instead of the mouse and keyboard.
In my automated fader proto I use 12 bit ADDA, for the moment due to jitter I run 9bit, but it’s a PTP proto with long and non shielded wire, i think I will end up prootocol 10bit step and with some luck at 11bit. Jun 08 9: It is the only control protocol that can take full control of all Pro Tools features including plug-in selection and parameters. If you have an Android tablet lying around or and Android phone you can get the app and try it yourself — the lrotocol scenario in which I found it useful is when tracking or if you are handing the tablet to the artist who is recording so they can mix the headphone cue they are receiving themselves.
Their revolutionary product called the Raven comes in several shapes and sizes and prices but they all essentially provide a similar set of features. Which, in such case, must be circumvented. And such an endorsement reflects a lot more than the opinion of some hard-headed audio engineers.
New EuCon Software For Euphonix MC Pro & System 5-MC DAW Controllers – ProSoundWeb
Yes, but they can’t protovol you from making or marketing something compatible, unless they have a straight patent on the core technology. If you set up the daw to output pre-fader directly to the converter then any moves that happen only effect the analog side and the output of the daw remains the same. One of us users is trying to procure the SDK from Avid. You might try to contact him.
This is called a control protocol and there are three main control protocols. After you get used to working one of these I am sure that it can come in handy, especially for those working with post-production.
Being able to work with the actual UI of the plug-ins you are used to instead of reading small text above an encoder that hints you to what you are modifying makes just so much more sense. Mmmm – those things look lovely, I must say.
However, again, I recommend that all those interested in HUI control surfaces for Pro Tools should try TouchDAW on a tablet before committing to a big buy — it is simply exactly the same as a hardware controller eucoj on a tablet and euco cheap.
The EuCon gear is: If I was going for form over function to impress clients, these would be my choice Originally Posted by RBowlin. My question is if there is already an external, which handles communication with eucon -enabled software logic, sequoia, nuendo, etc and provides an path-system similar to m4l. All times are GMT Pro Tools does not use MCU nor does it allow for it User Control Panel Log out. Find More Posts by musicbynumbers.
This is ecuon if we called it something else.