International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score calculator . of the pediatric versus adult IKDC Subjective Knee Evaluation Form in adolescents. IKDC SUBJECTIVE KNEE EVALUATION FORM. Your Full Name______________________________________________________. Today’s Date. Date of completion. IKDC SUBJECTIVE KNEE EVALUATION FORM . Thank you very much for completing all the questions in this questionnaire.

Author: Vikinos Taujin
Country: Poland
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Photos
Published (Last): 19 July 2007
Pages: 83
PDF File Size: 10.37 Mb
ePub File Size: 12.64 Mb
ISBN: 800-8-92530-128-3
Downloads: 42333
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Taurisar

The KOOS is freely available online. A group of knee surgeons from Europe and America met in and founded the International Knee Documentation Committee. However, the lack of patient contribution to the selection and revision of items in the IKDC means that content validity cannot necessarily be assumed.

A randomized trial of treatment for acute anterior cruciate questionnaite tears.

The KOOS has not been validated for use during an in-person or telephone interview. Studies consistently report no floor or ceiling effects i.

Free online IKDC knee score calculator

Does the mode of data collection change results in a subjective knee score? Imdc Information Method of development Item generation and reduction was conducted by interviewing patients considering TKR Oxford University Press; Following meniscal surgery, moderate effect sizes are seen 12 months postoperatively in those with isolated meniscal lesions, and large effect sizes are seen in those with combined lesions Table 2.

Recall period for items Previous 4 weeks.

Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Assessment of differences between the modified Cincinnati and International Knee Documentation Committee patient outcome scores: Charoencholvanich K, Qestionnaire B.


Reliability Internal quesgionnaire is adequate for patients with knee injuries and mixed knee pathologies Table 1. Although valid and reliable for use in groups, use of the TAS in research may need to be applied with caution. Validity Face and content validity The use of patients with knee disorders in both item selection and reduction ensures content validity.

Missing values The revised scoring method states that, in cases where patients have up to 2 missing values i. Based on these reviews, as well as extensive searches of more recent literature, we included the following 9 patient-reported outcomes: However, test—retest reliability is slightly below adequate for individuals who fall into a broader category of knee pathologies. In the VAS format, the ranges for the 3 subscale scores are: Practical Application How to obtain The revised version is freely available in the publication The MCID is missing from psychometric analysis.

Tegner Y, Lysholm J. There are consistent reports of high convergent and divergent construct validity, with the IKDC more strongly correlated with the Short Form 36 SF physical subscales and component summary than with the mental subscales and component summary 1116 — 1820 Psychometric testing is lacking for patients with knee osteoarthritis as an isolated group, as well as responsiveness following non-surgical management, highlighting areas for future studies.

It is important that researchers consistently utilize the same scale version Version No modifications to the original version. Validation of a Japanese patient-derived outcome scale for assessing total knee arthroplasty: Validity Face and content validity Since the WOMAC was developed with extensive input from patients with OA, as well as input from academic rheumatologists and epidemiologists experienced in clinical assessment of rheumatologic diseases, the WOMAC can be considered to have face and content validity.


Dimensions deemed to be important to patients included pain, function, quality of life, and activity level.

Measures of Knee Function

University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. Training is not necessary, as the questionnaire and scoring instructions are self-explanatory.

J Med Assoc Thai. The KOS-ADL is reliable, valid, and appropriate for measuring change following nonsurgical and surgical interventions in a variety of knee conditions. Psychometric Information Method of development Items were generated by survey of patients with knee or hip OA, review of existing questionnaires e.

Free online IKDC knee score calculator – orthotoolkit

Light activities like walking, housework or yard work. A more recent study reported that the KOOS subscales had acceptable dimensionality The ease of administration and scoring makes it a useful tool for clinical use. Recall difficulty; lack of psychometric testing. The lack of direct patient input into item selection means that content validity cannot be assumed.

Thank you very much for completing all the questions in this questionnaire. Acceptability No floor effects have been detected 46 To merit inclusion in this review, measures of knee function were required to be patient reported and assess aspects iksc important by adult patients with knee problems such as injury or osteoarthritis OA.

Extensive input from patients in the development of the OKS ensures content validity.