जनहित याचिका (Janhit Yachika). by अँड. वि. पु. शिंत्रे (Adv. V. P. Shintre). ISBN: Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this. Title, Meri Janhit Yachika Evam Anya Kahaniyan. Author, Pradeep Shrivastav. Language, Hindi. Year, Binding, PB. Pages, p. ISBN, , Bharat Main Janhit Yachika Aur Manav Adhikar by Aruna Rai, , available at Book Depository with free delivery worldwide.
|Published (Last):||10 July 2015|
|PDF File Size:||18.16 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||16.37 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The Court entertained a letter from two professors at the University of Delhi seeking enforcement of the constitutional right of inmates at a protective home in Agra who were living in inhuman and degrading conditions.
Proudly Powered by Blogger. Choose category Acts 19 Anti Corruption 2 B.
Bharat Main Janhit Yachika Aur Manav Adhikar
Policy making and implementation of policy are conventionally regarding as the exclusive domain of the executive and the legislature. The concept of Public Interest Litigation PIL is in consonance with the principles enshrined in Article 39A of the Constitution of India to protect and deliver prompt social justice with the help of law. The case was filed in the Supreme Court before the bench headed by Justice P. A writ petition was filed in the Gujarat High Court seeking the closure of asbestos units, stating that the material was harmful to humans.
Join Us on Facebook Powered By gktimes. Before the s, only the aggrieved party could approach the courts for justice. Any public-spirited person can file a Ajnhit case. The Charter Act A definite attempt was made by it to secure a ban on these activities with the ultimate intention of increasing the demand of cast and ductile iron products as they are some of the suitable substitute for asbestos.
The high court dismissed the petition, stating that janhiit was filed at the behest of rival industrial groups who wanted to promote their products as asbestos substitutes.
Public Interest Litigation is directly filed by an individual or group of people in the [Supreme Court of India] and High Courts of India and judicial member.
The bench clarified that it was necessary to erase the impression on some that janyit superior courts, by entertaining PIL petitions for the poor who could not seek protection of their rightsexceeded the unwritten boundaries of their jurisdiction. Article 32 of the constitution of India is known as ” Right to Constitutional Remedies “.
AB4ALL Catalog › Details for: जनहित याचिका (Janhit Yachika)
The author who claimed he was never officially notified by the court has republished the book online with German NGO Asia House. Understanding the Right to Constitutional Remedies: What is a Public Interest Litigation?
There yachikaa many cases like this have registered in the supreme court. In DecemberKapila Hingorani had filed a petition ywchika the condition of the prisoners detained in the Bihar jail, whose suits were pending in the court. The court declared that till the legislature enacted a law consistent with the convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women which India was a signatory, the guidelines set out by the court would be enforceable. The judgement of the case recognized sexual harassment as a violation of the fundamental constitutional rights of Article 14Article 15 and Article His statement was widely welcomed, because the instance of frivolous PILs for pecuniary interest has increased; a bench of the high court has also expressed concern over the misuse of PILs.
Government Of India Act Public Interest Litigation Cases. In Kalyaneshwari vs Union of Indiathe court cited the misuse of public-interest litigation in business conflicts. Writing the judgment in a case concerning sewage workers, Justice Singhvi stated: Sudershan Reddy and S. It was felt that their interests are undermined by the government.
Public Interest Litigation (PIL) – “Janhit Yachika” « G.K TIMES
Retrieved from ” https: However, the person filing the petition must prove to the satisfaction of the court that the petition is being filed for a public interest and not just as a frivolous litigation by a busy body “. The court must be satisfied that the Writ petition fulfils some basic needs for PIL as the letter is addressed by the aggrieved person, public spirited individual and a social action group for the enforcement jqnhit legal or Constitutional rights to any person who are not able to approach the court for redress.
The flexibility of procedure that is a character of PIL has given rise to another set of problems.